The question before the court is whether cheap champagne and Lumpfish caviar on Ritz crackers is sufficient to buy a Supreme Court justice or is addition financial inducement required?
Wednesday, November 16, 2011
Scalia and Judical Ethics
The question before the court is whether cheap champagne and Lumpfish caviar on Ritz crackers is sufficient to buy a Supreme Court justice or is addition financial inducement required?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
These guys have long ago tarnished the court by their abandonment of even the slightest trace of impartiality and by their putting out a sign offering themselves for sale. They are a blight on the court. In a sensible world, these people would be in jail for influence peddling.
Post a Comment