tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20070006.post3708870639616160075..comments2024-03-28T04:39:55.959-07:00Comments on A Little Reality: There Will Be Bloodknighterranthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14886831250521410342noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20070006.post-20616936228598694632009-10-06T21:15:14.720-07:002009-10-06T21:15:14.720-07:00And the purpose of wearing a gun to a political me...And the purpose of wearing a gun to a political meeting is????knighterranthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14886831250521410342noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-20070006.post-74301185277955468692009-10-06T18:34:51.429-07:002009-10-06T18:34:51.429-07:00So, let me get this straight. You want me to surre...So, let me get this straight. You want me to surrender my CONSTITUTIONAL 2nd Amendment right to carry a gun so that you can excercise your Constitutional 1st Amendment to talk and peacably assemble? No man has the right to deprive another of his rights. I have the right to carry a gun; you have the right to peacably assemble. We can both exercise those rights without infinging on the rights of others. If the people with guns threaten others, then they need to be arrested for it as that's illegal. But, if they haven't done that or anything else illegal, leave them alone. What it comes down to is that you don't like people carrying guns, so you want to prevent them from doing it. You wouldn't like it if I didn't like you talking and prevented you from talking, would you? Probably not. So, unless the people carrying guns do something illegal, leave them alone. <br />And by the way, those people you mentioned couldn't be prosecuted for second degree murder under California state law. If someone was murdered as a direct result of their (Beck, Limbaugh, etc.) actions, it would be an Accomplice. Look up Penal Code 1111 for that.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com